Support for Choice 1
- Archived: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:32:00 -0500 (EST)
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:20:16 -0500 (EST)
- From: Karyn Gill <KarynGill@aol.com>
- Subject: Support for Choice 1
- X-topic: Choice 1
I am currently a member of a County task force charged with
review and reform of our local campaign finance ordinance. What
I am finding is that members of the task force only volunteered
to be on the task force because they have a financial
self-interest in "reforming" the ordinance--they are either major
fund-raisers for both parties, incumbent politicians, or, in one
case, the chair of the County's major political party. Their
first order of business was to raise the campaign contribution
limits. There was a huge fight over what was a "reasonable"
limit --$250, $500, $1,000, unlimited? I've come to believe
after this experience that "reasonable" limits are in the eye of
the beholder. Nothing will solve this problem until there is
public financing of elections, with appropriate caps on money
collected and incentives to limit spending---with free County
cable TV air time for candidates. I'm seriously thinking of
floating a local initiative to be placed on the next ballot
requiring just that.
|