REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE OR POST A NEW MESSAGE   
  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

RE: Purpose of public participation conference

  • Archived: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:02:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:54:29 -0400 (EDT)
  • From: Karen Stromberg <Karen.Stromberg@state.ma.us>
  • Subject: RE: Purpose of public participation conference
  • X-topic: Evaluation
I made some specific comments on this toward the end of Local involvement/Superfund discussion. I think that the attitude must come from the top down. PI must be respected, part of the culture, the norm. It should be evaluated as part of job performance, should be factored into project planning and evaluation. Somehow people seem to be able to figure out what's appropriate and what's not within their jobs, what's expected, what's valued. If they don't, then they usually don't last very long. I guess maybe it's just harder to let go of government employees who don't join the bandwagon.
  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Welcome | About this Event | Briefing Book | Join the Dialogue | Formal Comment | Search

This EPA Dialogue is managed by Information Renaissance. Messages from participants are posted on this non-EPA web site. Views expressed in this dialogue do not represent official EPA policies.