REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE OR POST A NEW MESSAGE   

  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

EPA's evolving role - 2-way communication & trust

  • Archived: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:26:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:23:43 -0400 (EDT)
  • From: Barry Zalph <bzalph@co.jefferson.ky.us>
  • Subject: EPA's evolving role - 2-way communication & trust
  • X-topic: Local Issues/Superfund

Jerry Filbin has given some encouraging examples of EPA's work to assist in community-based environmental decisions. Over the past week, I have found striking the range of trust and respect (from nil to high) expressed by participants toward the EPA. Inevitably, Mr. Filbin has encountered anti-EPA sentiment among some participants in the community-based decisions in which his office has provided support.

My question: How does EPA overcome or transcend a bad reputation (whether or not deserved) to become adequately well trusted in a given community to function effectively as an impartial assistant? I ask this both with regard to EPA's providing technical assistance and providing process assistance (convening, facilitating, etc.)

I suspect that the answers to this question could apply to other local, state, and federal agencies that seek to assist impartially in public policy discussions or decision-making processes.


  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Welcome | About this Event | Briefing Book | Join the Dialogue | Formal Comment | Search

This EPA Dialogue is managed by Information Renaissance. Messages from participants are posted on this non-EPA web site. Views expressed in this dialogue do not represent official EPA policies.