REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE OR POST A NEW MESSAGE   

  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

RE: Reasonable Worst Case

  • Archived: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:28:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:37:02 -0400 (EDT)
  • From: James Cooper <james.cooper@socma.com>
  • Subject: RE: Reasonable Worst Case
  • X-topic: Outreach

Steve,

I think it is important to consider all evidence when assessing a situation. In scientific disciplines, we are taught that the difference between sound science and mere conjecture is the ability to set up the same circumstances and obtain a similar result. In this case, we able to sniff out the frauds; and no amount of money can buy sound science. Either the results are repeatable, or they are not.

When it comes to making decisions that can cost millions of dollars to our economy, I think many different factors should be considered. But I believe the factors should be as factual as possible and not related to how strongly one feels about it. Too often, people come to meetings expecting their positions to be considered, but do not do any homework prior to the meeting. This leaves them with an opinion, and how strongly they feel about it. The people that have the most impact at these meetings are those that gather as many facts as they can, and present them in an objective, straight-forward manner.

Regards,
Jim


  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Welcome | About this Event | Briefing Book | Join the Dialogue | Formal Comment | Search

This EPA Dialogue is managed by Information Renaissance. Messages from participants are posted on this non-EPA web site. Views expressed in this dialogue do not represent official EPA policies.