Responding to a post from: "Hotka, Cathy" <HotkaC@nrf.com> >Remember that the concept of universal service is to ensure that everyone >has a base level of connectivity -- up until now, that has meant a black >rotary dial phone in the home. Your proposal would increase that level of >support to ensuring that everyone understands how to use any of the various >kinds of software that schools or libraries might install. Are you willing >to see the open-ended cost of that idea reflected in your home phone bill? That's why having some policy that means that universal service means access to the communication that the Net makes possible, such as access to Usenet, email and text based browsers that a freenet makes available is a means that can both satisfy the necessary commitment to universal service and the low cost that is needed to make this available to all. Encouraging universities or colleges, and other nonprofit institutions that might have excess Internet access they can make available, via some kind of subsidy to nonprofit institutions, rather than to profit making bottom line corporate interests, would seem to be more the kind of policy that should be considered. In the most recent issue of the Amateur Computerist (a newsletter we make available online and which I gave to the chief of staff of the FCC when he left out criteria for universal service to the home in the talk he gave at INET '96 in Montreal) is available via email. You can write to ronda@umcc.umich.edu or jrh@umcc.umich.edu for a copy. The most recent issue included a history of cleveland freenet, a report on the Telecommunities '95 Conference in Canada where they raised the challenge of providing access to the Internet to all by the year 2000, the Access for All FAQ from Germany, etc. Ronda