Re: Values
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 00:19:37 -0400 (EDT)
- From: National Dialogue Moderator <moderator>
- Subject: Re: Values
- Contributor: CONSULTING EXPERT: Bob Myers
A "floor of economic protection" would provide -- as does Social
Security -- benefits for all persons subject to the risk involved
(e.g., old-age retirement), although with relatively larger benefits
for low-income persons than for high-income persons. A "safety
net" would provide -- as does public assistance -- benefits only
for persons in dire need. If we had only a safety net, the
disadvantage would be that many persons would not save or desire
a pension from their employer, beause this would only result in a
corespondingly smaller safety-net payment. With Social Security,
only about 10 percent of persons have incomes below the poverty
level, and about half of them receive safety-net payments through
public assistance. Without social security, about 50 percent of
persons would have incomes below the poverty level, and most of
them would need safety-net payments through public assistance.
Bob Myers