REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE OR POST A NEW MESSAGE   

  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

ESA

  • Archived: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:33:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:26:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • From: Marge Welch <mw4pfusa@bellsouth.net>
  • Subject: ESA
  • X-topic: Evaluation

The MOA signed between EPA, USFWS, and NMFS dealing with ESA protections is totally inappropriate. In the MOA, the USFWS agrees to make all critical habitat designations reach compliance with strict EPA Clean Water Act rules, the EPA agrees to make all Clean Water programs meet critical habitat criteria, and both of them must meet NMFS requirements. Under those circumstances none of the agencies can attend to their own duties and we, "the regulated public" don't have any idea what, if anything, we can do on our own property or who is in charge. We can neither plant nor reap. I objected to this MOA when it was released in the Federal Register and I still object. We, at the Property Rights Congress of America, request the agencies revoke that MOA.


  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Welcome | About this Event | Briefing Book | Join the Dialogue | Formal Comment | Search

This EPA Dialogue is managed by Information Renaissance. Messages from participants are posted on this non-EPA web site. Views expressed in this dialogue do not represent official EPA policies.