REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE OR POST A NEW MESSAGE   

  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

RE: EPA's evolving role - 2-way communication & trust

  • Archived: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:24:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 01:42:13 -0400 (EDT)
  • From: Rich Puchalsky <rpuchalsky@att.net>
  • Subject: RE: EPA's evolving role - 2-way communication & trust
  • X-topic: Local Issues/Superfund

Phil Chapman writes:
"The EPA will remain at odds with the public as long as it is run by druids (i.e., zealots who worship trees and sacrifice people."

You know, I was talking to an EPA employee about this once as we were doing a Midwinter ceremony. "You know, John," I said, as we were about to rip out the still-beating heart of the victim we had tied to the sacrificial altar, "perhaps this human sacrifice thing is giving us a bad name. Do you think we should take this up at the next branch meeting of the subcommittee on public relations?" "That's a good idea," he replied as he reached for his special mistletoe pen. "Let's run it past the deputy administrator for administration and resources management." But with all the dancing around the great oak, his notes were lost, and the idea just slipped our minds. Can we add this suggestion to the official summary and perhaps to the Draft Public Involvement Policy (revised) itself? No ancient druidical rituals of human sacrifice, please. And cut those travel allowances to Stonehenge.


  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Welcome | About this Event | Briefing Book | Join the Dialogue | Formal Comment | Search

This EPA Dialogue is managed by Information Renaissance. Messages from participants are posted on this non-EPA web site. Views expressed in this dialogue do not represent official EPA policies.