RE: Improve Input to Permitting

[Bill Aird <bill.aird@cta-otc.gc.ca>]

Hi - Bill Aird from the Canadian Transportation Agency in Ottawa Canada.

Charlie has provided us with an extensive list of items to go into an initial permit notification.  The assumption appears to be that the public should receive a complete understanding of the permitting process up front.  I think that I can see where Charlie is headed - effective public participation must be based on a full knowledge of the process but does the public need to know everything in order to decide to participate. The public's reaction may be one of information overload.

It makes me think of the two general types of overhead presentations that we have all seen.  The first is the entire talk on a series of black and white overheads (preferably in 10 pt which no one can read) which the speaker proceeds to read to the audience. The second involves threads (maximum of 5-6 lines per coloured overhead) which the speaker taks to.  Which style should a notice emulate? Yes I realize there may be legal requirements to be met.

Shouldn't a notice be a salient announcement of what, why, when and how with references to where to get the details.  Thus the public is informed of the action being undertaken and where to get the specifics to be able to make informed comment.  In other words, capture the public's interest through a brief invitation then allow them to delve into the details.  With that in mind, what from Charlie's list must the public receive up front and what other information should they be directed to?

Thanks Charlie for your thought provoking message
Bill