RE: useful/difficult features of web sites, information that should be on line

[Nadine L. Scott <deannie@nctimes.net>]

I could not agree more with you; the lack of information or attempts to get the information out is surprising.  For instance, the EPA may lodge the Federal Register at libraries, but many, many rural folks don't live near enough to make this a practical source of information.  Further, the FR itself is cumbersome, incoherrent and user unfriendly itself.  If you want people to be able to comment, you must lower the level of comprehension down to a suitable level.  I am an attorney with a very high level of comprehension and the FR frustrates the heck out of me!

Further, much more information needs to be posted on Internet sites.  For instance, the EPA site on Water:- the downloads take way too long. NOT EVERYONE is hooked up to direct cable or phone lines.  Most of us non-government folks still use modems.  Another example, the public involvement page only lists a few of the regions..what's up with that???

Further, the so-called 'concerned citizens' pages need LINKS!!! Links to partners like the USDA, NRCS, NACD, and so forth.  The EPA looks like it stands alone, but there are thousands of working partners out there who place an emphasis on voluntary compliance. All that is apparent on most EPA websites is the hammer, ie. the stick, not the carrot.  You must become more 'friendly' and realistic and downplay the enforcement angle.  That should be saved for the really bad actors, not "joe farmer" who may just need information to become a better land and water steward!