REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE OR POST A NEW MESSAGE   

  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

RE: Identifying the public

  • Archived: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:38:48 -0400 (EDT)
  • From: bob eisengrein <beisengrein@fiam.net>
  • Subject: RE: Identifying the public
  • X-topic: Outreach

Being primarily concerned with local issues,i.e., a Superfund site and local hazardous waste sites, we know the remediation process takes a long time. Our Superfund site Consent Decree was signed in 1980, and remediation should be complete about 2005. We have used many Seniors as part of our citizen organization, since often they have the time and expertise to add constructive criticism to the process. however, we wonder if all of us will be around for the final project ending; I am now 81!)

Because of the length of cleanups, and the need for continuity at both EPA and communities, good records and periodic reports are vital for a successful project. Identifying people on both sides of the table, EPA & citizen alike, is important initially and through the project life.

One valuable tool in MA is the socalled PIP, or Public Involvement Process. Obtaining ten or more signatures of affected citizens will require the PRP to hold public meetings at regular intervals to explain their actions. Citizens can ask questions at these meetings to explain actions, or request considering other related issues.

EPA should consider a PIP for Federal Waste sites of all kinds


  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Welcome | About this Event | Briefing Book | Join the Dialogue | Formal Comment | Search

This EPA Dialogue is managed by Information Renaissance. Messages from participants are posted on this non-EPA web site. Views expressed in this dialogue do not represent official EPA policies.