REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE POST A NEW MESSAGE   

  Author  |   Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Student Learning

  • Archived: Tue, 04 Jun 14:44
  • Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 14:42:26 -0700 (PDT)
  • Author: "Ruby, Jacki" <rubyfox@lmi.net>
  • Subject: Student Learning
  • Topic: Student Learning

Several questions are raised in regards to student learning:
the conditions necessary for a quality education include a
credentialled teacher who has continued his/her
professional learning with professional staff development, a
single vision adopted by teachers, administrators, parents
and clearly promulgated so that everyone in a school setting
knows what the goals are, the books, equipment and other
necessary resources to achieve those goals, and finally a
learning environment that is clean and well-maintained.
2) We ask students to keep their options open. However,
some of the proposals close those options by not allowing
students with different modalities of learning and acquiring
knowledge to have a "rigorous and challenging curriculum."
When business people and others use these words that
believe that the only true course is to have a single
curriculum, i.e. college preparation without regard to the
other career-technical and, yes, vocational education that
some students desire. However, we should not be like the
European system in which we have students take their
'elevenses' which directs students either to college prep or
vocational education. Students must be freely able to
choose from a wide variety of curriculum choices while
being prepared to learn a core curriculum. Otherwise, if we
only have college prep courses, we will be seeing students
drop out at a younger and younger age; those who have
difficulties without adequate remediation and tutoring, will
feel hopeless.
We do not expect less of students not prepared either
through course work or the ability to fund a college
education, however, we have not included career-technical
and vocational education choices in our high schools.
Those latter areas have not been funded.
Recommendation 21: Diagnostic assessments are part of
every good professionals repertoire. We have gone
overboard on the assessments for accountability purposes
rather than assessments that target areas for remediation
and learning. I totally, agree, with recommendation 21.3 that
the use of authentic assessments are necessary rather
than norm referenced tests.
Recommendation 28: The problem with trying to quantify
and assess various indicator is that the science of
psychometrics is not yet sophisticated enough to get the
nuances of human behavior down to numbers. Teacher
and professional observation often tells us more that the
numbers in an API or Opportunities for Teaching and
Learning Index.

  Author  |   Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Welcome | Agenda | About Dialogues | Briefing Book | Search