> > Turning Schools Systems into businesses: > > Schools are educational institutions. There have often been > suggestions that they "resell" servcies of one sort or another to help > > It is a long term mistake to try and turn schools into To reinforce this point, a quick review of Internet history is in order. http://dubhe.cc.nps.navy.mil/~budden/lecture.notes/internet_history.html has the class notes that I use to teach this lesson. In 1988, National Science Foundation took over management of the Internet from DARPA (this is when the name changed from ARPANET to Internet). At that time NSF funded operation of the backbone (today the NSPs -- network service providers) in toto. NSF also subsidized a couple dozen Internet service providers (NEARNET, SURANET, BARRNET, CERFNET, ...). These were usually university based and all were non-profit. All operated under NSF's acceptable use policy which mandated non-commercial use only (a policy which did allow corporate R&D outfits and even wholly commercial companies to connect, but for non-commercial use ... became an unenforcable policy, but got overtaken by events). By about 1992, the number of commercial connections to the Internet overtook the number of R&E (research & education) connections and has been outstripping ever since. Note that this happened while the NSF non-commercial AUP was still in effect. In 1993, the NSF subsidies ceased. In the five years, the 'net grew from thousands of users to millions of users -- a pretty dramatic scale up. In the process, DARPA hatched and NSF nurtured an entire industry which, with the end of the subisdies, was weaned. And the Internet service providers? All of them 'went legit'. Some reincorporated as tax-paying, commercial use corporations. Others got themselves bought by tax-paying, commercial use companies (NPS gets part of its service from BARRNET which went commercial by betting bought by BBN). None, to my knowledge, went away. And these ISPs got joined by a much larger throng -- I've heard nose counts of 3000-7000 ISPs in the country today. And, by going commercial, the R&E AUP was no longer applicable. Somehow, I think trying to de-commercialize an industry that was very carefully and deliberately commercialized by federal policy (some things inside the Beltway actually do work right) is not a direction we should be working in. Rex Buddenberg