As a participant and liasion in a state-wide cooperative plan, I'd like to add a few items. Our academic and public school connectivity was designed by the same man, the Dept of Computer Services and the Arkansas State Library are working with them to have public library system be compatible as well. There is also several community based LAN projects going on that are compatible to the others systems. The bottom line is--we can't afford not to cooperate, because we don't have a large pool of money to draw from or an inexhaustible supply. The cooperative efforts--a state-wide technology plan--keeps us from wasting money of project that won't mesh. Some coordinated plan between the schools, library, state agencies, and the academic community will help in countless ways. Sharing funds instead of competing against each other, best use the expertise of technology personnel and ways of devising the best use to the community. An example of what happens when groups go different routes in networking happened with the libraries already. We've had trouble here convincing administrators that school libraries library holdings need to be in MARC formats for networking--the ANSI standard. All public libraries and academic libraries are in a shared national database but to have the school included they'll need to spend additions funds to meet the standards already set. This is what can happen if each group decides to go in a different direction. A lack of compatibility in systems occurs, as happened in early PC days when schools were MAC based and public libraries were IBM based. As a result of no compatibility, more money will need to be spent to correct problems later on. We have 29 phone companies in this state so think what would happen if each of those phone companies devised a different plan for their communities? Sally Hawkes 501-682-6052 Coordinator of Library Network Services 501-682-1531 fax Arkansas State Library shawkes@comp.uark.edu On Sun, 15 Sep 1996, Jan Bolluyt wrote: > I disagree with Ken Hammer on one point, the state approved technology plans. > > The plan is not for the state, but for the library or district. Many of us > do not have the expertise to know what is available, and will naturally look > at other plans to copy, but is that so bad? This idea is bad only if the > state imposes its expectations on the plan and makes us clone "the best". > > A mandated plan is a necessity to get everyone thinking about the goals that > this universal service can help us meet. If we are unable, or do feel the > time is well spent, then perhaps universal service is not needed at this time. > > Jan >