Debate & Discuss |
Message Archive |
Thread Index |
Previous in thread | Reply to this message | Next in thread |
bruno.info-ren.org id KAA28139 Sender: owner-pgh-inet@network-democracy.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: pgh-inet@network-democracy.org Request For Information >From Canadian Dominant and Non-Dominant Carriers To Be a Partner in the OCRInet Dark Fibre Consortium 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this Request For Information is to solicit proposals from Canadian national facilities based dominant or non-dominant carriers who wish to become a partner in the OCRInet Dark Fibre Consortium. 2.0 Background The concept of a metropolitan dark fibre consortium managed optical infrastructure is an exciting new networking development that may result in significant business opportunities for both the providers and consumers of fibre telecommunications infrastructure. The development of low cost optical technologies such as 10Gigabit Ethernet and Coarse Wave Division Multiplexing (CWDM) and the extension of well known LAN architectures from the desktop to the wide area will allow the deployment of very low cost broadband optical networks for the carriage of high speed data traffic to the home, school and business. This new approach of consortium management of dark fibre facilities can present significant new business and research opportunities for Canadian manufacturers, telecommunication suppliers and carriers. Consortium managed dark fibre facilities extend the Internet model of autonomous peering networks to the optical domain. Besides the direct cost savings in telecommunications costs it is expected to result in many other direct benefits to the participating organisations such as: (a) Enabling fibre rings as a customer option, rather than a fixed feature of the network. Customers can choose whether or not to build their own rings for restoral or protection at either the physical or virtual layer using such techniques as dual homing, MPLS or connecting to entirely separate dark fibre network; (b) Extending the campus LAN into the wide area, which will allow for the consolidation of network servers and the elimination of border routers; (c) The ability to join a number of ÏcommunityÓ network facilities for the sharing of community services, interchange of traffic and consolidation of legacy services such as PSTN Ò IP telephony gateways, connections to multiple ISPs at a GigaPOP or IX, etc This model of consortium managed dark fibre facilities will become a reality once dark fibres become a communications commodity that is priced according to the cost of provisioning rather than priced according to potential derived values. There are presently two business models used in deploying fibre. The first is associated with the telephone and cable providers who are valuing fibres based upon their derived service potential. Their primary business is not selling fibre and thus the fibre infrastructure is reasonably well utilised. The second business model is represented by the new fibre entrepreneurs who justify the fibre installations based upon the perceived high fibre price structure of the traditional carriers. Their fibre infrastructures are not well utilised but the few that are sold are carrying the cost of the idle facilities. Neither business model takes into account the potential of customer empowered networking. It is proposed that by pricing fibre on the basis of cost, there will be an upsurge in demand with the potential result of: a) no net revenue loss and possible revenue gain b) increased consumers benefit c) stimulating the advancement and demand for broadband services d) position Canada ahead in the global economy. These outcomes are not conjectures but are already being demonstrated in such places as Stockholm where the city is treating fibre as a municipal utility. The same fibre-pricing model applies to both the carriers and the individual. Already Stockholm has the lowest ISP rate and is the centre for broadband services innovations in Europe. 3.0 Particulars In order to assist the realisation of cost-based dark fibre services, OCRInet, in partnership with over 20 leading education and research organisations in the Ottawa area, is facilitating the deployment of a condominium dark fibre network in the Ottawa metropolitan area. It is hoped that this pilot will serve as a model for other communities across Canada and permit Canadian enterprises to take the lead in developing services and applications in an environment where the cost of bandwidth is significantly reduced. A preliminary engineering survey for the deployment of a condominium dark fibre network in the Ottawa area has already been completed. Based upon the result of this study, the partners in the OCRInet Dark Fibre Consortium are encouraged to enter into the next phase of the project where the actual needs of the partnership in terms of the dark fibre requirements will be costed and acquired. Issued concurrently with this RFI is an RFP to obtain the services of a fibre consultant who will help the partnership with the realisation of its objectives. It is anticipated that the fibres can be provided by interested carriers at a one-time cost of less than $500k. The consortium would like the delivery of the fibre no later than September 2000. The Consortium is ready to deploy its own fibre, but wishes to explore the possibility of finding a carrier partner that is willing to supply the required fibre. Through this RFI process we hope to find a suitable partner. The fibre requirement is contained in Appendix A. All fibre requirements are expressed in terms of individual single-mode, 1550 nm low dispersion fibre. The required fibres are to be delivered to the telecom room at each of the addresses listed in Appendix A and terminated at a patch panel. The carrier is to provide 20-year irrevocable right of use (IRU) for all supplied fibre. The carrier will also be paid an annual fibre maintenance fee. The members of the consortium are willing to pay for their portion of the cost. As the consortium will be using its fibre consultant to assist the selected carrier with the design and deployment of the fibre infrastructure, the members of the consortium will agree to only pay for their portion of the direct costs associated with the fibre deployment. The consortium is willing to entertain any fibre cable routing on the condition that the consortium will not be invoiced for any costs above those developed by its consultant in the detailed engineering design. It is to be noted that the requirement to access the Bell Canada Central Office at 78 OÌConnor Street is for the explicit purpose of connecting to the CANARIE CA*net3 research and development network. CANARIE has obtained agreement from Bell Canada for access to the Central Office for this single purpose. The selected carrier will have access to the design information of the consortium fibre consultant and is free to question the design parameters. Any disputes are to be resolved by an independent third party. All of the members will be individually responsible for lighting up their own fibre strands generally using, for the most part, a combination of Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet and 10Gigabit Ethernet switches and transceivers. The participants will also be responsible to determine the appropriate drivers and lasers as well as installing repeaters and or regenerators if necessary. A key requirement is that no conditions of use be imposed on the condominium participants usage of their fibre strands. The successful bidder gets a guaranteed up front payment equalling to half of the total cost of the installation. This cost is based upon the detailed engineering design of the consortium fibre consultant. The successful bidder is required to post a bond equal to the up front payment plus 25% to ensure the completion of the construction. 4.0 Evaluation Criteria The members of the consortium will evaluate the proposals based on the criteria identified below and may elect to reject all submissions or select one (or more) partners with which to proceed on the construction of the condominium dark fibre build. The proposals will be evaluated on the following major criteria: (a) the willingness to work with the consortium fibre consultant to jointly develop the fibre infrastructure; (b) the willingness to commit to 20 year IRU; (c) the applicants ability to deploy municipal dark fibre networks within the stipulated time frame, but most importantly, familiarity in negotiating support structure agreements with the local utility and incumbent carriers; (d) the applicants interest to develop a cost-based fibre pricing structure; and (e) the ability to provide a detailed costing formula that is equivalent to or less than that provided by the consortium consultant. There is a some degree of uncertainty and risk associated with building consortium managed dark fibre facilities. As such considerable emphasis has been placed in the engineering and design of such a network. The makeup of the consortium is free to change over several iterations of preliminary designs. Once the members of the consortium agree to enter the detailed engineering design phase of the project, the makeup of the consortium and the fibre requirement will be fixed. 5.0 Requirements All respondents to this RFI must specify precisely how they intend to deliver the minimal requirements as specified in this document. The applicant is encouraged to suggest other features and options in their submissions. 4.1 To provide a cost estimate of what the respondent expects to be the cost of providing the required fibres. The cost estimate is in terms of fibre segments so that each member can develop its cost of the total. The final project cost cannot exceed the cost estimate provided; 4.2 To make available a planned future costing model that can be used to: (a) order additional fibres, (b) add new sites, (c) or add new members 4.3 Upon completion of installation a) To OTDR (Optical Time Domain Reflectometer) all links and to show evidence of all splices at less than .05 dB insertion loss. b) To provide overall fibre signal loss data for each fibre pair. 4.4 The fibres are to terminated at the customerÌs premises as indicated in the attached document. A patch panel is to be provided at the customer premises. Standard patch terminations are required for the patch panels. 4.5 The fibres are to be provisioned at a one-time up front cost for a minimum of 20 years. If there is a cost difference to provide the required route diversity, ensure that both costs are provided (ie with and without the diversity provisioning). 4.6 The cost formula for annual maintenance are to be provided. 4.7 To allow the fibres to be used for any purpose whatsoever. 4.8 To provide a detailed fibre maintenance management agreement for each participating organisation, specifying mean time to repair a fibre break and procedures for notification of a fibre break, etc. 4.9 Respondents to this RFI are encouraged to suggest innovative cost recovery plans that may be attractive to the OCRInet dark fibre consortium members. 6.0 Timetable Due to the constraints of a winter construction the RFI response and evaluation must be completed by the end of 15 February 2000. As such interested parties who wish to respond to this RFI are invited to submit detailed proposals to OCRInet, on or before 31 January 2000 12:00 Noon EST. The applicant is requested to supply a time table for the deployment of the network. However, a substantial portion of the network should be in place and operating by 2nd quarter 2000 with the entire network deployed by the 3rd quarter 2000. 7.0 Proposal Submission Information 7.1 Recommended Format of Submission: Company Introduction and Description Responses to RFI sections 4.1 through 4.9 List of all key technical and managerial personnel including descriptions of their qualifications and the tasks, activities and responsibilities that each will be assigned in relation to your proposal. Attach resumes of key personnel. Organisational chart with the names and titles of all personnel associated with the delivery of the proposed services. List of at least three references of clients provided with similar services including name, address and phone number of each reference. Summary of services to be provided. 7.2 Form of Submitted Responses Proposals must be submitted in the following form: Ö Two (2) written copies of your proposal including one with original signatures; Ö A diskette(s) containing your response to this RFP in MSWord for Windows format. Responses should be mailed to: OCRI Attn: Jim Yuan 36 Steacie Drive Kanata, ON K2K2A9 8.0 Further Information The Ottawa Fibre Consortium will be solely responsible for the review of responses to this RFI, and will decide whether or not to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP). If workable solutions are received from proponents responding to this RFI, the consortium group reserves the right to proceed directly to contract. Respondents should note that their response to this RFI (or possible RFP) will not obligate the consortium to award all or part of the project to the respondent, or to incur any costs associated with responding to the RFI. Proponents interested in responding to the RFI are required to send their intent by registering with Joanna Yuan jkyuan@ocri.ca. If there is sufficient interest, a vendor meeting will be arranged. A notice will be sent out to all registered potential bidders informing them of the time and location Questions concerning the RFI will be disseminated to all potential respondents. Please address all such questions to Joanna Yuan. For further information please contact: Jim Yuan Director of Technology OCRI, SmartCapital jyuan@ocri.ca