Aloha to you all! Ellen Miyasato and I have agreed to moderate this forum and look forward to a lively interchange with you over the next several weeks. And who knows, maybe even longer! Our mission, should we decide to accept it, is to consider issues such as: Technology planning Administrative use of technology Bringing all players to the table Interacting with the bureaucracy Overcoming inertia The tension between politics and educational reform Harnessing existing funds for educational reform Of course, there are no grownups in the room so we can ignore these suggestions and take off in direction you would like. One of the benefits of being 5 hrs behind the East Coast is that this is one of the last "welcome" messages to go online and I got to check out the others before posting this. There's a lot of text and content on-line already and no interaction yet. I'd say if we can get just a couple of lively discussions going with *real* interchange among us that we can consider this a success. So let me throw out a few provocative (I think) statements and see if any of you agree/disagree. As this develops it may be useful to try to focus our discussion, but for now, let's just see if we have anything to talk about. Any technology plan with user involvement and buy-in will be obsolete by the time it's completed. The only way to fund educational networks is to integrate them completely with administrative networks. Unless we "fix" colleges of education then everything we do in the field is a band-aid. There weill never be adequate technical support for schools, so teachers must learn to support themselves with the help of their students. You can't change anything unless the teachers are all on-board. Teachers will never change, so reform begins at the top. The Universal Service Fund will solve all the technology problems in our schools. Reactions / comments / corrections???