Kam's point, below, is well taken. > Simply put, translation of findings into practice > happens slowly if at all. This is certainly true. One possible reason for this is the often blurred line between educational evaluation and educational research. True evaluations are conducted to help inform specific educational decisions regarding specific educational programs or activities, for specific individuals who intend to use the results. Because of this, true evaluations tend to be very targeted, answering specified questions, and presenting findings in a manner which encourages implementation. On the other hand, educational research seeks to gain an in-depth, generalizable understanding of an educational program or activity, and the findings of these activities are typically "disseminated" as scholarly books and journal articles targeted to other academic researchers, and not to the (k-12) educational practitioners. In this sense, the optimal focus for our discussions might be less "balancing research and practice" and more "integrating research and practice." Other views? Arguments? Larisa Naples