Outline of Bipartisan Social Security
Agreement:
Senators Judd Gregg, (R-NH), John Breaux (D-LA),
Bob Kerrey (D-NE), Chuck Grassley (R-IA),
Fred Thompson (R-TN), Chuck Robb (D-VA), Craig
Thomas (R-WY)
Create Personal Security Accounts
- Starting in 2000, all workers will be able to invest a
potion of their FICA taxes in individual retirement savings accounts.
The account accumulations will supplement the worker's traditional
Social Security benefit. Individuals own all proceeds from their
personal account, and none of the accumulations are "clawed
back" by the Trust Fund. This means that they can pass on
their account balances to heirs.
- Use the model of the Thrift Savings Plan to administer personal
accounts to minimize employer burdens and administrative costs.
Individuals could choose to invest their personal accounts in any
combination of funds offered along lines similar to the Thrift
Savings Plan currently enjoyed by federal employees. The accounts
would be administered by the government, managed by private fund
managers, but owned and controlled by individual workers.
Strengthen the Safety Net Against Poverty Provided by Social
Security
- The proposal would gradually phase in a change in the
Social Security bend point factors to increase the progressivity
of the guaranteed benefit and reduce poverty among the elderly.
The 90%, 32%, and 15% bend point factors would gradually become
90%, 70%, 20%, and 10%. This change would neither save nor cost
revenue.
- Protect disability. Because disability benefits are not affected
by changes in retirement age, disability benefit levels would be
exempt from the legislation's application of indexation factors
reflecting changes in life expectancy. Personal account creation
would not reduce disability benefits promised, because an individual
who becomes disabled would not continue to receive payroll tax
refunds into personal accounts, nor the offsetting changes to
projected benefits associated with those contributions.
Reduce Future Tax Burdens Through Advance Funding
- Move a portion of promised benefits to a funded basis.
Surplus Social Security payroll taxes would be used to advance
beneficiaries a portion of future promised benefits. The amount
of the advance would be determined using the interest-compounded
value of the mandatory 2% tax refund into the personal account.
As a consequence, an individual who invested their personal account
in a bond that received the Trust Fund interest rate would experience
no change in their total Social Security benefit as a consequence
of this provision. An individual who wished to seek a higher rate
of return through investment in a fund that included equities could
do so.
- Reduce future tax burdens. By advance-funding a portion of
future benefits through personal accounts, the proposal would vastly
reduce pressure on all forms of future tax increases. Such tax
increases include the payroll tax increases that would be required
under current law to fund full benefits after 2034, as well as the
enormous general revenue outlays that would be necessitated beginning
in 2014. The bipartisan proposal would eliminate more than half
of the pressure upon general revenue outlays under both current
law and competing proposals, and eliminate entirely any reason to
increase payroll taxes.
Promote Wealth Creation
- A match program for low-income workers. Workers with
wages below the national average will receive an additional $100
contribution annually to their personal accounts when they begin
voluntary contributions, and a 1:1 match on subsequent contributions,
phased out as a function of total annual wages.
- Allow voluntary contributions. All wage-earners will be
permitted to save up to an additional $2,000 per year through
voluntary contributions to personal accounts.
- Include the Kerrey KidSave plan, using 50% of the accumulated
value of KidSave accounts to fund the beneficiary's Social Security
benefits.
Reward Work
- Eliminate the earnings test that currently penalizes
seniors who work.
- Credit all years of earnings in calculating benefits. Under
current law, only an individual's top 35 years are used to determine
one's Social Security benefit. Under this proposal, every year of
earnings, no matter how small, would add to total benefits received.
(The denominator of the AIME formula would gradually phase to 40.)
Also, five "dropout years" will be restored to the
individual with lower earnings from every two-earner couple, in
recognition of the likelihood that a spouse may have taken time
away from work to raise children.
- Correct the actuarial adjustment for early and late retirement.
Under current law, individuals do not receive back the value of
extra payroll taxes contributed if they delay retirement. Under
this proposal, both the early and delayed retirement adjustments
would be increased to the level appropriate to a recognition of
additional tax contributions.
Other changes to restore Social Security to solvency
- Modify the benefit formula to reflect increases in longevity.
Under current law, the normal retirement age will ultimately reach
67. This proposal would gradually phase in the change of retirement
age to 67 by 2011, and thereafter apply a life expectancy factor
to the PIA formula. If projections of life expectancy or other
factors cause a significant change in projected solvency, for better
or worse, the Social Security Trustees will be required to present
Congress with a proposal to alter the life expectancy factors, upon
which Congress must act or take an alternate action to restore the
system to balance.
- Provide for a more accurate Consumer Price Index. Provide the
Bureau of Labor Statistics with the additional resources and the
authority necessary to continue to correct current measures of the
Consumer Price Index. The total change in CPI would be 0.50% below
the assumptions in the 1999 Trustees' Report. In order to focus
the impact of all changes in the legislation solely on future
retirees, all individuals of age 62 or older by the year 2000 would
continue to have their benefits indexed under the current-law CPI
measure.
- Reform the indexing of the cap on taxable wages. Under current
law, it is projected that average wages will lag behind total
national wage growth, causing the share of total wages subject to
Social Security taxes to gradually fall. This proposal would
continue the proportion of national wages subject to tax at its
current level of 86%. The effect of this provision upon total
revenues relative to current law would depend upon the future
relationship between total and average wages.
- Recapture appropriate revenues for the Social Security system.
The proposal would estimate the effects of CPI reform upon income
tax collections, and return those collections to individuals in
the form of Social Security benefits. Also, between 2010 and 2019,
the legislation would slowly phase in the redirection of all Social
Security benefit taxation back to the Social Security Trust Fund,
consistent with the original intention of taxing Social Security
benefits.
|