RE: Raising the Wage Base
- Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 19:26:03 -0400 (EDT)
- From: National Dialogue Moderator <moderator>
- Subject: RE: Raising the Wage Base
- Contributor: PANELIST: Ann Combs
Taxing wages in excess of the current limit of $72,600 may seem like an
equitable solution. Why not just tax the wealthy? There are a couple of
reasons why this is the wrong solution. First, it is contrary to one of the
fundamental principles underlying our Social Security system -- equity.
Second, it will destroy support for the program among middle and upper
income workers which could lead to its demise.
Social Security is based on two principles -- benefit adequacy and equity.
Since the beginning, Social Security has always provided positive rate of
return on every worker's contributions. The benefit formula is designed so
that beneficiaries will be entitled to a benefit at least equal to the
taxes they and their employers paid over their lifetime. To date,
beneficiaries have received a positive rate of return (or interest) on
those tax contributions as well. If the wage base is uncapped entirely, or
raised substantially, that will no longer be true. Higher income workers
will pay more in taxes than they collect in benefits (even after their
benefits are increased to reflect their additional contributions). This
violates the equity principle.
It will also undermine support for the program. The fear is that higher
income workers (and those who see themselves growing into that category)
will see the "deal" getting worse and put pressure on Congress to let them
opt out of the program. It will start looking more like a welfare system
than a social insurance system. If Social Security loses the support of the
middle class it will no longer enjoy its protected status in political
terms. This is the reason many liberal supporters of the system oppose
large increases in the wage base.
Finally, there is the whole issue of payroll taxes. Why would we want to
increase a tax on work? Uncapping the wage base, or even increasing it to
$100,000, would be a huge tax increase -- 12.4% of every dollar earned. Do
we really want to impose more costs on labor? Admittedly, it's at the high
end of the income spectrum, but employers will respond by trying to keep
salary costs down through lower wages or fewer high-paid jobs.
Ann Combs