ML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> =0 width="90%" cellpadding=10 bgcolor="gray">

NOTES

^[1] See infra Table 1, Governance Background.
^[2] See Appendix B, John Gilroy, Governance Working Group Issue Paper No. 1: State-level governance of public education, kindergarten through 12^th grade: Education administrative and policy entities, their roles and relationships, March, 2001.
^[3] See infra Table 2, Governance Background.
^[4] There was limited discussion about revisiting the constitutional provision regarding county offices. See Appendix A, Meeting Summary 7, page 3 (the heading in the summary on page 3, “Group Decisions about Intermediate Agencies” should be understood to mean only tentative agreement found on that day among most of the members in attendance during that particular discussion).
^[5] Michael A. Resnick and Harold P. Seamon, Effective School Governance: A Look at Today’s Practice and Tomorrow’s Promise, January, 1999.
^[6] Gordon (Spud) Van de Water and Terese Rainwater, What is P-16 Education? 2001.
^[7] After discussing the possibility of assigning data collection to the Governor, the group reasoned that the Legislature would then be likely to create a data collection agency under its own control, to ensure objectivity of the data collected. When the group discussed the possibility of assigning data collection to the Legislature, it reasoned the Governor would then also be likely to create a data collection agency, once again to ensure objectivity of the data.
^[8] Thomas Timar and David Tyack, The Invisible Hand of Ideology; Perspectives from the History
of School Governance, January, 1999.
^[9] Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 349, U.S. 294, 75 S.Ct. 753, 99 L.Ed. 1083 (1955).
^[10] Timar and Tyack, supra note 1, January, 1999.
^[11] Id.
^[12] Cristina Gibson, Emerging Strategies for Private-Sector Governance, January, 1999.
^[13] See Appendix B, John Gilroy, Governance Working Group Issue Paper No. 1: State-level governance of public education, kindergarten through 12^th grade: Education administrative and policy entities, their roles and relationships, March, 2001.
^[14] Id.
^[15] Id.
^[16] Id.
^[17] Gibson, supra note 5, January, 1999.
^[18] Id.
^[19] Gilroy, supra note 6, March, 2001.
^[20] See also, Education Commission on the States, ECS Statenotes, Governance, Models of State Education Governance, March, 2000.
^[21] See Appendix B, Reference Materials, AB 139, History and Development of California’s County Superintendent of Schools and County Boards of Education, and Statutory Functions of County Boards of Education and County Superintendents.
^[22] Id., Statutory Functions.
^[23] Education Commission on the States Information Clearinghouse, School Districts: State Realignment Activities,District Realignment Activities in the States, 1996.
^[24] Id.
^[25] EdSource, December, 1999.
^[26] Id.
^[27] Education Commission of the States, The Progress of Education Reform, 1999-2001.
^[28] Michael A. Resnick and Harold P. Seamon, Effective School Governance: A Look at Today’s Practice and Tomorrow’s Promise, January, 1999.
^[29] Id.
^[30]Aimes C. McGuinness, Governance and Coordination: Definitions and Distinctions, December, 2001
^[31] Aims C. McGuinness Jr., “Essay,” 1997 Postsecondary Education Structures Sourcebook: State Coordinating and Governing Boards, Education Commission of the States, Denver, CO: 1997, pp. 31-33, cited in Governance and Coordination of Public Higher Education In All 50 States, The North Carolina Center for Public Policy Research, 2000, viii-ix.
^[32] Education Commission on the States, web site language, 2001.
^[33] See Appendix B, Christine Morse Galves, Issue Paper No. 2, Higher Education in California: History of Change, Coordination of the Tripartite System, and Community College Governance, April, 2001.
^[34] CPEC, 1999.
^[35] New Community College Transfer Students and California Public Universities, California Postsecondary Education Commission Factsheet, January, 2001.
^[36] CPEC web site language, 2001.
^[37] Galves, supra note 26, April, 2001 (describing the four configurations of state-level governance to foster coordination).
^[38] Gordon (Spud) Van de Water and Terese Rainwater, What is P-16 Education? 2001.
^[39] Id.
^[40] Education Commission on the States, State Master/Strategic Plans for Postsecondary Education,
December, 2001.
^[41] Van de Water and Rainwater, supra note 31, 2001.
^[42] M. Bruce Haslam and Michael C. Rubenstein, K-16 Alignment as a Strategy to Improve the Connection Between High School and Postsecondary Education, posted to the Education Commission on the States’ web site with permission of Policy Studies Associates, still posted there as of January, 2002.
^[43] James England, Bringing Secondary Education into the Information Age: Universal College Preparation, June, 2001.
^[44] Van de Water and Rainwater, supra note 31, 2001.
^[45] Lars Kongshem, Smart Data: Mining the School District Data Warehouse, September, 1999.
^[46] Successful completion of AP courses is commonly necessary to gain access to the UC system and other competitive colleges.
^[47] ACLU website.
^[48] See Appendix B, Ballot Charters, 2001.
^[49] See generally, Id.

Table of Contents
Summary	Introduction	K-12	PS
K-16	Conclusion	Background	Members