RE: opening for choice 3
- Archived: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:46:00 -0500 (EST)
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:03:23 -0500 (EST)
- From: Margaret Holt <mholt@coe.uga.edu>
- Subject: RE: opening for choice 3
- X-topic: Choice 3
In some gatherings I've attended recently some have argued that we already have full disclosure at the federal level, so why is this even included as a "choice?" At the forum at the Carter Library, one man suggested that it would be more useful to have a choice three that had us entertain the option of "third parties".
Finally, I'd like to say that some suggest that simply reading 3 pt. type listings of disclosures doesn't mean much of anything.
What's behind these contributions? Is there evidence of quid pro quo?
|
|
Date
|