REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE OR POST A NEW MESSAGE   

  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Decision Sharing/Making

  • Archived: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:16:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 20:38:17 -0400 (EDT)
  • From: Karen Stromberg <Karen.Stromberg@state.ma.us>
  • Subject: Decision Sharing/Making
  • X-topic: Collaboration

I think the public walks into these situations with a misunderstanding of what's being asked of them and what their role is. The government always has the final say, but in most cases wants to hear what the public wants to say. If they don't provide the opportunity, then the public bashes us over the head to get our attention. Agencies can be coerced to make certain decisions based on public pressure, so perhaps that is a way to view collaboration, but there is almost always some bottom line the agency can't go below. We can discuss and allow the public to help decide the best way to reduce risk, but whatever the way, it has to meet the regulatory criteria, including a risk-based standard and feasibility. If everyone can agree on how to get there, great. But if not, the government can not abdicate it's responsibility and allow the public to decide. There is not true power sharing in these situations, but the process lends itself to being interpreted that way by the public, and sometimes the agencies themselves.


  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Welcome | About this Event | Briefing Book | Join the Dialogue | Formal Comment | Search

This EPA Dialogue is managed by Information Renaissance. Messages from participants are posted on this non-EPA web site. Views expressed in this dialogue do not represent official EPA policies.