REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE OR POST A NEW MESSAGE   

  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Collaborative Learning

  • Archived: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:42:00 -0400 (EDT)
  • Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:41:36 -0400 (EDT)
  • From: Will Focht <wfocht@okstate.edu>
  • Subject: Collaborative Learning
  • X-topic: Collaboration

I was unable to post a message yesterday, but I wanted to offer this comment on collaboration.

I strongly recommend that public participation advocates/sponsors/professionals read two books that bear on how stakeholders can collaborate in environmental decision-making. The first is the National Research Council's Understanding Risk (1996), which discusses the recursive integration of analysis and deliberation. The second is Daniels and Walker's Working through Environmental Conflict (2001), which discusses collaborative learning. In my view, collaborative learning, based on soft systems methodology and conflict resolution theory, is an ideal way to facilitate framing analyses in deliberation and to inform deliberation from those analyses.


  Date  |   Subject  |   Thread

Welcome | About this Event | Briefing Book | Join the Dialogue | Formal Comment | Search

This EPA Dialogue is managed by Information Renaissance. Messages from participants are posted on this non-EPA web site. Views expressed in this dialogue do not represent official EPA policies.