Good afternoon, It struck me today that a potential flaw in the entire erate plan is the lack of incentives for the vendors. No matter how great of a discount, or where ever the service goes, they will be reimbursed at their designated full rate. That is a clear disincentive. (Deregulation of the cable tv industry raised my rates. Did anyone get more service and lower fees in the Commonwealth?) Each vendor wants to expand their current customer base...and keep their current customers at the same time. Any move by one firm to take customers from a second will incite a round of predatory price decreases by the loser...great for the consumers in the short term, but not true reform...and counterproductive to investing in the required infrastructure for rural communities. And I would not be exaggerating to say that one telecom vendor has already told my tech guy that the price reflected in a recent proposal for our business was designed so that the library would continue to pay the same actual dollar amount to his company...as much as I want a discount for the libraries in my district, as a taxpayer I have to wonder if this whole plan is a corporate welfare scheme for telecom firms? But all of the pleading on my part and others, will not upgrade telecom in rural areas without an incentive for the vendors...they have and will continue to ignore rural citizens as long as possible. cliff Cliff Farides District Consultant North Central Library District Home Email: cjf@technologist.com Phone: 717-326-0536 Fax: 717-323-6938