This week's discussion on the scope of Universal Service subsidies highlights a quandary that must be resolved as the Telecommunications Act is implemented. One can argue for narrowly focused subsidies on the basis that this will leverage other funds. Thus, if the subsidies pay for connectivity to a school or library, and if the school or library can supplement this money with the funds to pay for internal wiring, user devices, training and support, the subsidy can be said to have leveraged a much larger investment. There is some validity to this argument. I think that external connectivity tends to involve the newest and most unfamiliar elements of technology, so it does make sense to make a special effort in this area. On the other hand, if schools and libraries lack the funds to cover other necessary components of the infrastructure, there is a danger that many sites will be left with subsidized lines coming into the building and nothing inside to connect to them. And it's likely that this situation will occur most frequently in precisely those schools where the need is most urgent. How acute is this problem likely to be - and what mechanisms can we suggest to avoid it? This is not an easy question, but the answers that we find for it may be crucial for developing a Universal Service subsidy which can effectively meet the needs of all students and library patrons. Bob Carlitz Moderator