It seems that access potential and current technologies are so varied and changing so rapidly, I hope that universal access is not tied to a specific technology or equipment or defined so specifically to deny cost-effective and advanced technological changes. Usually libraries and school buildings are in the same local dial-in area and the necessary equipment for access could be centrally located in one of the buildings mentioned, yet accessed by all. The local Telco could work in cooperation with the school district and library. Their gain would be public relations and, if the technology stays with phone lines, an increase in the number of lines (and monthly revenue) to each of the buildings as the school integrates technology. As our schools become less typed to a building, I hope that universal access is not restricted to within the walls of a physical building as many of the definitions purvey. When do "students" stop their "studenthood". At what point do we deny subsidized access. College? Junior College? Early graduates? Adult education? GED students? "life-long" learners? Jan