Dr.Van Dam stated: > I would strongly argue that ANY request from an educational institution > should be honored. The tax-exempt qualification is fine, but I don't think > that is the question being asked by the FCC. They may be more concerned > with what is a BONA FIDE REQUEST, not who is a BONA FIDE agency to make a > request. In conversation with FCC representative this past summer, this > seemed to be their focus, the "content of the request", not the > "requestor." > > If I interpreted correctly, then all requests from educational agencies for > any type of voice, video or data service should be considered bona fide. > Any other approach infers a structure at some level, probably a state > level, to filter and evaluate the requests. I would not endorse that > approach. State agencies have enough to do without checking local > educational requests for electronic services. I think there are two issues here; 1) a bona fide request; and 2) from a bona fide school. I think if a request comes from a bona fide school, it should atomatically be considered a bona fide request. But I don't think we can have a very loose definition of a bona fide school. A list of bona fide schools should be developed by the appropriate agency in the state and forwarded to all the telecommunication providers so they know they are getting a request from a bona fide school. My only concern about "verifying" bona fide requests would be if the E-rate ended up being - free. Then I'd be concerned about abuse of the system with schools ordering services they were not ready to use. Steve Kohn