Debate & Discuss |
Message Archive |
Thread Index |
Previous in thread | Reply to this message | Next in thread |
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 12:04:41 -0400 >Reply-To: Telecom Regulation & the Internet <CYBERTELECOM-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM> >From: "Neil J. Lehto" <nlehto@AMERITECH.NET> >Subject: FCC Opens Proceeding on Open Access to Cable Systems >Comments: To: TeleComLaw@ari.ari.net, alliance-access@alliancecm.org, > telecomreg@relay.doit.wisc.edu, munitelcom@civicnet.net >To: CYBERTELECOM-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM > >NEWS > > Federal Communications Commission >445 12th Street, S.W. >Washington, D.C. 20554 News media information 202 / 418-0500 >Fax-On-Demand 202 / 418-2830 >Internet: http://www.fcc.gov >TTY: 202/418-2555 > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full >text of a Commission order constitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 >F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974). >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE >June 30, 2000 NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: >Michelle Russo at (202) 418-2358 > > > > FCC CHAIRMAN TO LAUNCH PROCEEDING ON "CABLE ACCESS" > >Kennard Says Time is Right to Establish Record on Marketplace Developments > > > > >Washington, DC - The Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission >(FCC), William E. Kennard, announced today that he will propose that the FCC >begin a formal proceeding on the issue of multiple Internet service >providers gaining access to a cable company's platform. >At a press briefing today, Chairman Kennard said that last week's decision >from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the AT&T v. City of >Portland case confirmed the FCC's role in establishing a national broadband >policy for the country. He also said that the court clearly recognized the >FCC's authority to forbear from regulation in this area. > >The FCC filed an amicus brief in the case that outlined the need for a >national policy and also informed the court that the FCC has not determined >whether high-speed Internet access over the cable plant is a >"telecommunications" service. The Ninth Circuit Court determined that this >type of service is both a "telecommunications" service and an "information" >service. Kennard said that the categorization of "telecommunications" >service does not necessarily mean that the service is subject to all of the >common carrier regulations that apply to telephone companies. The purpose of >the new proceeding will be to resolve these issues and bring certainty to >the marketplace. > >Kennard said, "I have asked the FCC staff to develop a framework for >addressing these issues. I continue to believe that there are powerful >marketplace incentives that will move the cable platform to an open >platform. Now is an appropriate time for the FCC to address the legal issues >and to assess developments in the marketplace." > >Chairman Kennard also said, "I agree with the municipalities in the goal of >an open cable platform. The question is how do we get there, through >government intervention or market forces? My preference is market forces, >but if the market doesn't work then we'll have to step in." -FCC- For more >information and news about the FCC, please visit the web site at www.fcc.gov