Debate & Discuss |
Message Archive |
Thread Index |
Previous in thread | Reply to this message | Next in thread |
Oregon ruling may fuel open access fight http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,0-37409,00.html AT&T told to open Internet access (Seattle Times and Associated Press) http://www.seattletimes.com/news/local/html98/cabl_19990605.html Judge to AT&T -- Free access for all! http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2270297,00.html AT&T Loses Round 1 On Cable-Net Access http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/news/0,4164,2270283,00.html AT&T takes a blow in cable fight with ISPs http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?99064.enatt.htm Of course, AT&T is not giving up. From the last article: "In a statement, AT&T implied strongly that it will appeal the district court's ruling. "The actions taken by officials of Portland and Multnomah County go beyond the legal authority municipalities have to review cable franchise transfers. Clearly we will continue to pursue our legal case," AT&T said in the statement. The National Cable Television Association (NCTA) offered a similar sentiment. "We shouldn't over-read this decision," NCTA spokesman Scott Broyles said in a prepared statement. "It wasn't too long ago that a federal district judge in Wichita, Texas, ruled that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 was unconstitutional. That's why we have appellate courts."