Beverly, Would like to know more about you TAPs incentives and the nature of the professional development. On Tue, 1 Apr 1997, Beverly Hunter wrote: > With regard to teacher change, > one strategy we (Vanguard for Learning) have found to be highly effective, > is to provide incentives for teachers to work in innovative teams (we call > them Team Action Plans (TAPs). In a school where teamwork has not been > common in the past, this can be a major catalyst for professional > development and creativity. > > At 7:43 AM -0500 3/31/97, Michael Williamson wrote: > >Hi, > > ASs far as change goes I feel that there is no one way to make changes. > >Administrators and teachers are very different in motivation and goals. > >unfortuately, many have the goal to stay the way it is now. We need to > >reach and use the administrators and educators that are motivated to > >support a multi-point "attack" to bring about change. Change might have a > >chance if we take every in-road that is available to us. > > > >Mike > > > > > >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > J. Michael Williamson > > Principal Investigator-WhaleNet <http://whale.wheelock.edu> > > Associate Professor-Science > > Wheelock College, 200 The Riverway, Boston, MA 02215 > >voice: 617.734.5200, ext. 256 > >fax: 617.734.8666, or 508.468.0073 > >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > >On Sat, 29 Mar 1997, Ellen Miyasato wrote: > > > >> Hey, David... > >> Happy Good Friday everyone...on with sustainabilitiy and > >> Institutionalization. > >> > >> What?? > >> Teachers will never change, so reform begins at the top? I agree with > >> you 1/2 ...IF we (teachers as well as staff development models) continue > >> with our current "view of education and learning-for both students and > >> teachers," we'll never change. > >> Reform from the top will last only as long as the leader lasts. > >> Throughout HERN, and entering into our third year...we are witnessing > >> several evolving patterns on teachers making changes: > >> - multiple dimensions of collaborative efforts among past > >> partcipants infusing their influence in other organizations > >> in Hawaii - like science, reading, foreign language, > >> professional teacher orgs > >> - multiple level resource collaboration among elementary, > >> high school, community college teachers and students > >> - teachers teaming with administrators in exploring the > >> restructuring of learning > >> During our third year, as the grant period ends, we're looking at two > >> leverages for the continued evolvement (more than sustaining) of the > >> reform efforts: engage educators in directing their own learning - an > >> opportunity to grow in a professional community focusing on developing, > >> providing ways of learning that are more in keeping with their > >> professional lives and building collaborative networks. The second has > >> been a challenge..during our first two years.. > >> > >> What are your thoughts on David's statement: Teachers won't ever change > >> so reform should start at the top? > >> > >> > >> > >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> > >>> Ellen Miyasato phone: (808) > >>956-2854 > >> Hawaii Education & Research Network fax: (808) 956-5025 > >> ellenm@kalama.doe.hawaii.edu > >> http://www.hern.hawaii.edu/hern/ > >> > >> > >>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~> > >>> > >> > >> On Mon, 17 Mar 1997 david@hawaii.edu wrote: > >> > >> > Aloha to you all! > >> > > >> > Ellen Miyasato and I have agreed to moderate this forum and look > >>forward to a > >> > lively interchange with you over the next several weeks. And who > >>knows, maybe > >> > even longer! Our mission, should we decide to accept it, is to consider > >> > issues such as: > >> > > >> > Technology planning > >> > Administrative use of technology > >> > Bringing all players to the table > >> > Interacting with the bureaucracy > >> > Overcoming inertia > >> > The tension between politics and educational reform > >> > Harnessing existing funds for educational reform > >> > > >> > Of course, there are no grownups in the room so we can ignore these > >> > suggestions and take off in direction you would like. > >> > > >> > One of the benefits of being 5 hrs behind the East Coast is that this > >>is one > >> > of the last "welcome" messages to go online and I got to check out the > >>others > >> > before posting this. There's a lot of text and content on-line > >>already and no > >> > interaction yet. I'd say if we can get just a couple of lively > >>discussions > >> > going with *real* interchange among us that we can consider this a > >>success. > >> > So let me throw out a few provocative (I think) statements and see if > >>any of > >> > you agree/disagree. As this develops it may be useful to try to focus our > >> > discussion, but for now, let's just see if we have anything to talk about. > >> > > >> > Any technology plan with user involvement and buy-in will be obsolete > >>by the > >> > time it's completed. > >> > > >> > The only way to fund educational networks is to integrate them > >>completely with > >> > administrative networks. > >> > > >> > Unless we "fix" colleges of education then everything we do in the > >>field is a band-aid. > >> > > >> > There weill never be adequate technical support for schools, so > >>teachers must > >> > learn to support themselves with the help of their students. > >> > > >> > You can't change anything unless the teachers are all on-board. > >> > > >> > Teachers will never change, so reform begins at the top. > >> > > >> > The Universal Service Fund will solve all the technology problems in > >>our schools. > >> > > >> > Reactions / comments / corrections??? > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > Beverly Hunter > Program Manager, Educational Technology Systems > BBN Systems & Technologies Division > 70 Fawcett Street > Cambridge, MA 02138 > http://copernicus.bbn.com > > >