Gwen, et al, I remember Miss Lord, my second grade teacher at Coffin School in Brtunswick, Maine above all others. I remember her because she saw my writing, which so often ended up in crumpled balls in the back of my desk, never being passed in on time, often lost, and said that it was good. She changed my life. I also remember my 9th grade French teacher, though I have forgotten her name, because she taught me enough in French 1, primarily through insufferable drill and extensive homework, to allow me to move easily through French 2 -4. She too, gave me a gift. Certainly content and method are both critical pieces of the experience we call education, but there are so many who see the delivery of networked technology to a school or classroom as the 'fix'. A "build it ind it shall happen" belief. I heard Secretary Riley say, at the 1994 Secretary's Conference on Educational Technology that the Internet would be, "...the great equalizer. That no longer will there be a difference between the resources vailable to the students in Pasadena and the students in Harlem..." It seems to me that the content may be the same, provided machines to get to it, but the situation in which those resources are accessed, the culture of the place each site calls 'school, that is the 'how' of the teaching and learning experience the learners are involved in will be vastly different. The same is true of southern Maine and Washington County. So I guess I would hold to placing the how first, followed closely, or even joined equally by the content, but in my heart I cannot say that the content is above all else. Standards can be met by engaging students in quality settings, using innovative and engaging resources around an integrated curriculum, led by teachers who share a passion for learning. The foundation is this passion; the curiosity for learning that must be shared, nurtured and valued by student and teacher, community and family. With that 'how' in place, adding in the wonderfully powerful and creative content becoming available online, just imagine what will happen. Jim At 5:29 PM -0800 3/27/97, Gwen Solomon wrote: >At the risk of misunderstanding ... > >Jim says, "It is how we teach more than what we teach..." > >Let's not forget that the goal is to help students to achieve at high >standards. So while it is definitely important to teach well, we shouldn't >put content in a secondary position. > >One of the problems is that teachers are expected to do everything well >without having "well" clearly defined (by teachers? for teachers?) and >there's so little support for teachers to achieve high levels of teaching. > >Gwen > > >--------------------------- >Gwen Solomon, Director >The Well Connected Educator >837 E. Palm Drive >Glendora, CA 91741 >818-335-6836 voice >818-335-6846 fax >gwen@gsn.org >http://www.gsh.org/wce >--------------------------- Jim Moulton, Staff Developer, Community of Learners jmoulton@horton.col.k12.me.us http://www.col.k12.me.us (207)729-2959 Fax: (207)729-2967