Traditional content and process emphases in delivering science and math instruction rarely focused on teachers deciding what and how to teach. Prescribed curricula embodied in textbooks and more recently in manipulatives and hands-on materials, never intended for teachers to get "too creative" in delivering the product. In fact, I can remember discussions which identified certain curricula, both content and process, as "teacher proof." What a challenge we now face when access to network technology brings to the classroom resources, communications, and collaboration opportunities which demand that teachers make conscious decisions about what and how to teach. How are we helping teachers deal with this disconnect? This is very unsettling to dedicated, veteran teachers who feel caught in a bind between articulated "district curricula," methodologies that have supported them as teachers for years, standardized testing geared to old ways of presenting content, and extensive, dynamic, current opportunities that come to their classroom each day via network technology. In my experience with Science Learning Network teachers, their growth in creating images of a new classroom environment for learning using telecomputing is astounding. What lags behind are the strategies, time, support, and skills to design and implement a new learning environment based on these developing images. Steve ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stephen H. Baumann (baumann@fi.edu) Director of Educational The Franklin Institute Science Museum Technology Programs 222 N. 20th St. (tel) 215-448-1206 Philadelphia, PA 19103 (fax) 215-448-1274