Subject: Time: 6:04 = PM OFFICE MEMO Muddying the waters Date: 4/1/97 This is probably too late and we'll need to have this conversation in = person, but I did want to comment on Laurie's question about the focus = being on process or product. This really struck a chord with me. I'm = having trouble seeing this question as a clear dichotomy. In our = project, the "intended" product will be a prototype website that allows = investigation of a database (of video clips of the Monterey Undersea = Canyon), but by far the most interesting work that I am doing has less to = do with the product and more to do with how we are getting the work done, = or what I guess you would call the "process". I put the latter term in = quotes because, as with all the other projects I have worked with, the = "evaluation" of the "process", has taken new directions from the original = vision, and these change processes will be ultimately, I think, the most = valuable "products" that we can disseminate. That is not to say that the = prototype won't be valuable in and ofitself, it will be. And I'm doing = that evaluation as well! But the building, and re-building, of this = collaboration is the really interesting piece right now and the sharing = of my findings with the participants on an on-going basis has led to some = fascinating, and useful conversations. It's not project evaluation as I = was trained in my doctoral stories? But it sure will be useful to me and = others who intend this type of collaborative process in the future. So = maybe the process is the product?!?