I stongly agaree with Chris' comments about the importance of looking to the broader audience as well as the immediate audeince of those involved in an evaluation. Consistent with this orientation, I would suggest that an emphasis on why things went as they did may be very informative, rather than focussing exclusively on how much was accomplished with a given program. The program is likely to be evolving and even if it is not the context in which it is functioning will be. This means that success in one year does not guarantee similar success in the next. But if we can understand the dynamics of what it occurring, it may be possible to understand how to direct and manage the change so that it is fruitful. In addition, this may help people elsewhere to understand the degree to which finding in one case or likely to applicable to their own somewnat different case. Janet Schofield