Request for Proposals (RFP)
February 15, 1996
I. PURPOSE OF THE INITIATIVE
The Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh (CK:P) project is one of four network
testbeds funded by the National Science Foundation. CK:P represents a
collaborative effort among the Pittsburgh Public Schools, the University
of Pittsburgh and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center. Its charge is
to investigate the changes in the teaching environment of the Pittsburgh
Public Schools as a result of introducing Internet technologies into
classrooms.
During its first year - 1993 - the project began at four sites: McCleary
Elementary School, Schenley International Studies Program, Westinghouse
Science and Mathematics Program, and Woolslair Elementary Gifted Center.
In 1994, Carrick High School, East Hills International Studies Academy,
Frick International Studies Academy, Fulton Academy of Geographic and
Life Sciences, Liberty International Studies Academy, Phillips
Elementary, and Spring Hill Elementary came aboard. In 1995 Allegheny
Middle School, Knoxville Middle School, and Schiller Middle School were
added.
Each CK:P site has a specific curriculum project that uses the Internet
as a resource and a hardware configuration that is unique to that
particular building and project. To help teachers implement the
curriculum activity at their site, they receive training and ongoing
support from the CK:P staff.
The 1996 Request for Proposal - RFP - will identify 6 new high school
sites. Proposals can be submitted by teams of teachers, students,
administrators, parents, and support staff. The proposals will be
reviewed by a committee of teachers, administrators, board members,
parents and community representatives. This committee will make its
selections based on the strength of the curriculum project being
proposed, the team of educators who will implement the project, and the
equitable distribution of network resources within the building.
Each school site chosen will receive wiring, network equipment, computers
and support from the Common Knowledge staff. Schools should note that
this is a limited installation that will not meet the needs of the entire
school. CK:P will provide the foundation of a network infrastructure
that is both scalable and sustainable.
II. CK:P PROJECT GOALS
Five goals were stated in the original grant proposal to NSF.
- Teaching Environment: The network shall enhance the
- teaching environment for all teachers in the Pittsburgh Public
- Schools by expanding the personal contacts and information resources
- available to these teachers.
- Curriculum Development: The network shall be available to serve
- the development of curricular activities of the Pittsburgh Public
- Schools in all subject areas and at all grade levels.
- Access to Information: The network shall provide information
- services not currently available to the Pittsburgh school system.
- School Restructuring: The network shall serve as a tool in the
- restructuring efforts of the Pittsburgh Public Schools.
- A National Model: The network and its associated curricular
- activities shall serve as a national model for the implementation
- of wide area networks in the K12 environment.
School proposals should be aligned with these goals.
III. TIMELINE FOR THE RFP
- February 15, 1996 - RFP Mailed Out
- February 15 - March 31 - Proposal Writing, Visit Existing Sites
- March 29, 1996 - Proposals Due to CK:P
- April 22, 1996 - Third Year Sites Announced
- June 1, 1996 - Wiring Designs Finalized
- July 1, 1996 - Equipment Ordered
- Summer, 1996 - (Tentative Workshop)
- January 1, 1997 - Full Implementation
IV. PRIORITIES FOR THE PROPOSALS
CK:P's experience indicates that the most powerful and successful
proposals are those that are focused within a single department, theme or
activity. Proposals written by staff that actually use the Internet in
their classrooms increase the probability of success. Proposals written
by single individuals generally do not have faculty ownership and
therefore lessen the probability of success. Proposals must address
three major topics: Curriculum, Teaming, and Equitable Distribution of
Resources.
CURRICULUM
Our experience indicates that successful Internet projects thrive in
environments that allow students and teachers to become partners in the
learning process. Proposals must describe a focused curriculum activity,
the necessary instructional procedures, and an assessment plan that is
aligned with the curriculum goals.
- ¥ Network activities are by nature research oriented and
- interdisciplinary. Projects need to be focused on
- specific areas of the curriculum that take advantage of
- network resources.
- ¥ The instructional procedures must describe a shift from a
- teacher-centered paradigm to a research oriented
- student-teacher partnership.
- ¥ The Internet project must be clearly integrated with the
- school's Comprehensive Educational Improvement Plan (CEIP)
- plan.
- ¥ Project goals need to be consistent with District
- curriculum standards. Your project's curriculum
- standards should be clearly stated and measurable.
- ¥ Technology should be viewed as a tool for curriculum
- delivery.
TEAMING
Creating a school team that can both design and implement the proposed
project is critical. Experience within CK:P indicates that projects
that are designed by a single person are destined for failure.
- ¥ There must be evidence that the team has the support of
- the administration, other teachers in the building and
- the feeder-pattern community.
- ¥ Individual members must present their vision of the
- activity. This should include the individual's commitment
- to the proposal as exemplified by his/her willingness
- to: modify classroom interactions, learn and implement a
- new technology, and work collaboratively with colleagues.
- ¥ A description of how the school team will manage the
- project needs to be part of the proposal.
EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF RESOURCES
In developing a proposal, school teams must consider the challenges the
School District faces in educating its diverse population. Experience
through CK:P indicates that teachers are eager to use this resource with
gifted and talented populations, but are reticent with mainstream
students. Our experience indicates that there is much to be gained by
offering this resource to ALL students. Therefore, priority will be
given to proposals that:
- ¥ focus on under-represented populations
- (e.g. females in mathematics/science, African Americans
- in accelerated classes ... ),
- ¥ come from schools that have little or no access to technology,
- ¥ propose to work with at-risk students,
- ¥ propose open access points such as libraries,
- ¥ demonstrate continuity within a school's feeder pattern.
- (e.g. work with students from other CK:P sites).
V. PROPOSAL WRITING GUIDELINES
Each proposal will be read and scored by a Review Committee following the
guidelines and criteria listed below. The maximum score is 100 points,
(the score for each section is indicated in parentheses.) A tentative
list of committee members is found at the end of this document. The
committee will select six proposals to fund for the 1996-97 school year.
- ¥ Proposals must not exceed 10 pages, double spaced, with
- one inch margins.
- ¥ The minimum type acceptable is 10 point.
- ¥ A Cover Page and an Introduction may be included; these
- are not part of the 10 page limit.
- ¥ Letters of Support and the school's CEIP plan, must be
- included as appendices.
- ¥ Each school must submit 25 copies of its proposal.
Part One - Curriculum Project (30 Points)
The project must be focused, taking into account both the complex nature
of
learning and traditional high school barriers such as scheduling,
tracking, and
teacher-centered models of instruction.
- Problem Statement
- ¥ Define the learning problem that your
- curriculum/network project addresses.
- Curriculum Activity
- ¥ Describe the link between existing curricula and
- the proposed activity.
- Instructional Procedures
- ¥ Develop an instructional plan for using this tool
- in the classroom.
- Assessment Plan
- ¥ Describe how you will measure success both from
- teacher and student perspectives.
Part Two - Design and Implementation Team (40 points)
The design team must be the group that implements the project.
Ownership and accountability are keys to success.
- Support and Vision
- ¥ Include a letter from each team member that
- describes his or her motivation, goals and
- responsibilities for the activity. Include letters of
- support from school administrators. A maximum of
- five additional letters of support from relevant
- community members and school-support staff may
- be included. (Submit as Appendix A.)
- ¥ Describe the members of the school team and
- discuss each individual's responsibilities.
- ¥ Demonstrate that the proposal is not the work of
- a single individual.
- Management
- ¥ Describe how the team will manage the project in
- the school.
- ¥ Designate a site coordinator.
- Comprehensive Educational Improvement Plan (CEIP)
- ¥ Align your proposal with your school's CEIP
- plan. (Submit the CEIP plan as Appendix B.)
Part Three - Equitable Distribution of Resources (30 points)
Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh is committed to placing its resources at schools
with a clear need for network resources.
Statement of Need
¥ Describe why your school should receive this
resource.
Under-represented Populations
¥ Describe the particular needs of your students
and community.
¥ Discuss the effect of your project on at-risk students.
Continuity
¥ Work with existing CK:P sites in your feeder pattern.
VI. HELP WITH PROPOSAL WRITING
The CK:P Education staff is not part of the Review Committee, therefore
we are available to help teams develop project ideas, explore the
Internet, and help with proposal writing.
- ¥ The CK:P staff can demonstrate the network at your
- school, provide workshops for your team at the Beta Site -
- Woolslair, G8 - or work individually with team members.
- ¥ Teams can consult with the many Internet experts in the
- school district.
- ¥ The winning proposals from Year Two and Three are online at:
- /projects/ckp/curriculum/curriculum.html#action
School teams can visit the CK:P Beta Site during our weekly "Come Visit"
sessions. CK:P staff will be available during these sessions for
training or consultation. Please call or send email to let us know you
are coming. If other times would be more convenient, call (622-5930) and
we can make other arrangements. The following Come Visit sessions are
scheduled:
- Wednesday, February 21, 1996 form 3:20 - 5:00
- Wednesday, February 28, 1996 from 3:20 - 5:00
- Wednesday, March 6, 1996 from 3:20 - 5:00
- Wednesday, March 13, 1996 from 3:20 - 5:00
- Wednesday, March 20, 1996 from 3:20 - 5:00
- Wednesday, March 27, 1996 from 3:20 - 5:00
EQUIPMENT and SUPPORT
Each Common Knowledge project site will receive the following:
- ¥ Networking equipment including a server, router, and
- concentrator
- ¥ Internet Connectivity
- ¥ $50,000 worth of computer and peripheral equipment
- ¥ $12,500 worth of Local Area Network wiring
- ¥ Staff training by CK:P educational staff
- ¥ Technical support from both CK:P and PPS staff.
If the site has equipment - PC 486 DX or higher, MAC LCIII or higher -
that is powerful enough to add to the LAN, CK:P will assist at getting
this equipment placed on the school network.
Staff training will occur at the school on inservice days, at the CK:P
beta site in an increment credit course, or at the school site at times
convenient to the faculty. There is no money for paid staff
development.
Schools should note that this is a limited installation that will not
meet the needs of the entire school. CK:P will provide the foundation of
a network infrastructure that is both scalable and sustainable.
FINAL NOTE
It is difficult to write a proposal using a resource that is only vaguely
understood. We recommend that the site team get Internet accounts
immediately. Please call CK:P at 622-5930 to request accounts.
In addition, the following people can help to answer questions that may
facilitate your writing process.
- Robert Carlitz - CK:P Project Director (624-9027)
- Barry Check - CK:P Support Staff (624-5930)
- Regine Fougeres - Teacher - Schenley (622-8200)
- Priscilla Franklin - CK:P Support Staff (622-5930)
- Kevin Barry - Teacher - Carrick H.S. (885-7700)
- Kathy Olesak - Librarian - Schenley (622-8217)
- Linda Savido - Librarian - Westinghouse (665-5022)
- Richard Wertheimer - CK:P Support Staff (622-5930)
- Mario Zinga - CK:P Support Staff (622-5930)
CK:P Review Process
All proposals will be read by a committee of educators. The committee
will rate the proposals on the basis of curriculum, network team and
statement of need. The committee will reach consensus on the schools to
be selected. CK:P staff will facilitate the process, but have no input
into the actual ratings.
- Chair: Richard Wertheimer (Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh)
- Facilitators: Barry Check (Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh)
- Priscilla Franklin Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh
- Mario Zinga Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh
CK:P REVIEW COMMITTEE (tentative list)
- Lester Young, Principal, Westinghouse H.S.
- Russ Olejniczak, Teacher, Allegheny Middle School
- Paula Howard, Principal, Fulton Elementary School
- Mary Lou Ruttle, Librarian, Carrick High School
- Janet Bell, Area Supervisory Principal - E
- Andrew King, Area Supervisory Principal - N/W
- Anna McGuire, Area Supervisory Principal - E/C
- Brian White, Area Supervisory Principal - S
- Chip Burke, Grable Foundation
- Representative, Parent Groups - E
- Representative, Parent Groups - N/W
- Representative, Parent Groups - E/C
- Representative, Parent Groups - S
- Alex Mathews, PPS Board
- Phyllis Bianculli, PPS Board
- Lynn Mariaskin, School Support Services
- K. Cupples, School Support Services
- Claudia Harper-Eaglin, School Support Services
- Peter Camarda, Business Affairs
- Janet Stocks, LRDC, University of Pittsburgh
- Bob Carlitz, University of Pittsburgh
- Peter Berger, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
- Joe Kern, Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh