A VOYAGE ON THE INTERNET A COMMON KNOWLEDGE: PITTSBURGH PROPOSAL Submitted By PHILLIPS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SUMMARY 1. Team Members Rosemary Grogan, Instructional Teacher Leader Julie Halapatz, Parent Jeanne Halterlein, School Librarian Kathleen Hammer, Teacher Jennifer Johnson, Teacher Amanda Lakomy, Student Dr. Barbara Rudiak, Principal Essie Sing, Teacher Kay Smith, Teacher Jeannine Tobacco, Teacher Sharon Zietak, Parent Ruth Martin, Project Advisor Sarah Martin, Project Advisor Deborah Saltrick, Project Advisor Dr. Judy Westerman, Project Advisor/School Support Specialist at Phillips 2. Project Summary The staff at Phillips Elementary School has been an integral part of the Pittsburgh Voyager project since its inception in January 1993. Pittsburgh Voyager, Incorporated, a newly formed organization, is acquiring and equipping a U.S. Navy training vessel so that students in grades K through 12 can explore the Allegheny, Monongahela, and Ohio Rivers. This mobile learning center coupled with the Voyager�s dockside facility will provide hands-on, multidisciplinary discovery experiences for our students. This endeavor represents a partnership among the following entities: the South Side neighborhood, the Pennsylvania Fish and Game Commission, the Allegheny Intermediate Unit, Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Pittsburgh, and The Carnegie. On June 1, 1993 the scope and sequence of the Pittsburgh Voyager curriculum was developed, focusing on investigations based on the following themes: Water Quality and Environmental Indicators, River Navigation, Historical/Geographical Perspectives, Ship�s Log, and Boat Safety. Due to the proximity of the Pittsburgh Voyager and the Monongahela River to the school, the Phillips staff seized the opportunity to integrate river education into its curriculum. As the staff at Phillips embarks on developing the �river� curriculum, it is their intent to utilize the Internet technology to secure information during the curriculum writing phase as well as incorporate within the curriculum itself both multicultural and interdisciplinary Internet activities in which the students will engage. At present, the school has one Apple 11gs computer for connectivity to the Internet on loan from the former Pittsburgh Science Institute offices. This proposal is requesting additional computer equipment, accompanying telephone lines installed, a telefacsimile machine, student, faculty, and parent accounts as identified, training, and support. 3. Teacher and Student Involvement The Phillips/Pittsburgh Voyager partnership involves the entire faculty and ultimately the whole student body as the respective curriculum is developed. The current number of full-time faculty members is 10 along with six part-time teachers. The Pittsburgh Public Schools Membership Report As Of October 5, 1993 indicates that Phillips has an enrollment of 206 students, 8.3 percent of which are African-American. 4. Planning Process Overview Planning with Pittsburgh Voyager, Incorporated which resulted in the Phillips/Pittsburgh Voyager partnership began approximately one year ago. Planning for the inclusion of the Internet as an information utility and vehicle for learning in this endeavor began in November with two meetings on the 15th and 22nd which included the principal, parent representatives, the instructional teacher leader, and members from the Unit of School Support Services. The district-wide inservice day on November 29 was then spent with the faculty actively engaged in teaming activities led by Ruth Martin, School Support Facilitator, which involved generating river curriculum topics in preparation for the actual research and writing. In addition, the principal Dr. Rudiak presented and explained various concept models for developing an interdisciplinary curriculum. In the interim various staff members from Phillips visited the Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh administrative center at Woolslair and received an introduction to the Internet. Tremendous enthusiasm resulted from this visit to the extent that certain teachers are purchasing personal computers for ultimate Internet access from their homes. If identified as a Phase Two Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh site, the entire faculty will participate in the planning process due to the nature of the Pittsburgh Voyager curriculum scope and sequence (see Appendix) and prior involvement. Similarly, the Pittsburgh Voyager Team from the Unit of School Support Services will be involved as well as other community, academic, and business resources as appropriate. The faculty has noted the need to assemble all of the related project information already obtained into one resource area in the school and secure information on accessing the Internet there as well for background reading prior to receiving training. Teams of faculty members will be formed with all teams meeting on a weekly basis. Parents, students, and members of the Unit of School Support Services will also participate on teams as needed. A representative will be named from each team to coordinate the work among the various groups. 5. Evaluation Process Evaluation activities will focus on measuring to what degree do the students and teachers at Phillips exhibit skill in accessing resources on the Internet to gain information about rivers. Assessments for each learning activity will be developed within the curriculum as the activities are determined. Professional assistance related to ongoing evaluation will be provided by Deborah Saltrick, School Support Facilitator. PROBLEM STATEMENT 1. Problem Definition Phillips Elementary School has targeted the Pittsburgh Voyager project as a vehicle for creating a learning environment which is linked to �real world� experiences, interdisciplinary in nature, multiculturally sensitive, conducive to readily implementing several of the Pennsylvania Department of Education Chapter 5 Guidelines, and which effectively utilizes the latest information technologies. Recent standardized test results have indicated that the students at Phillips performed as follows: only 9% of the students scored at or above the national norm in writing; 55% of the students scored at or above the national norm in reading; and 56% of the students scored at or above the national norm in mathematics. These percentages are lower than the school district system-wide averages which are 29% in writing, 57% in reading, and 69% in mathematics. The South Side region like other communities along the rivers experienced the brunt of unemployment when the steel industry declined in the late 1970�s. In fact, 80% of the students in this neighborhood school qualify for a free or reduced price lunch. Day-to-day economic survival typically replaces long-range educational goals in this somewhat homogeneous community. Similarly, Phillips has been experiencing declining enrollment. The above information elicits the need to have the students go beyond the walls of their school building via the Pittsburgh Voyager and the Internet: to enhance their critical thinking skills; to improve their written communication ability; to advance in reading and mathematics; and to make Phillips a school with special emphasis. 2. Evaluation Success Success will be evaluated by monitoring the degree of sophistication the students attain as they progress from the primary grades through the intermediate grades in Internet usage. Guideposts will be how well they execute and complete each activity, how much improvement in communication skills is exhibited, and in what ways are the Internet searching and communication skills transferred to other learning situations by these students. THE CURRICULUM PROJECT 1. Curriculum/Network Project Description The Pittsburgh Voyager Curriculum Outline details student activities at the primary, intermediate, middle, and secondary levels for each of the aforementioned themes as noted in the �Project Summary.� River curriculum development at Phillips will only focus on the primary and intermediate activities with Internet use infused as applicable. The planning committee has generated several Internet applications for the project with all of them falling within two main categories -- �Communicating with Others� and �Gathering Information.� Communicating With Others Oral History Activities: Students will communicate with the Mon River Buffs, the Pittsburgh History and Landmarks Foundation, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission personnel, namely a river boat captain, a civil engineer, and a Department of Environmental Resources geologist. All of the above groups presently have Internet access. Buddy System Activities: Students will communicate with students at Westinghouse High School who are enrolled in the Science and Mathematics program which has Internet access as well. One project planned is the Westinghouse/Phillips Bridge Building Project whereby students from the Prep Program at Westinghouse will team with students from Phillips to communicate ideas and plans for building models of bridges. They will assemble for the final testing presentation of their models. Phillips students will also be paired with civil engineering students at Carnegie Mellon to learn about bridges and bridge construction in Pittsburgh. Voyager Activities: Since the Voyager will have Internet access at its facility, the students will use electronic mail to exchange information with other groups of students both while on board and at school to compare and analyze findings stemming from the prescribed, hands-on activities in the curriculum. Gathering statistics on the water temperature and level at different intervals for further investigation is one such activity. Key Pal Activities: It is planned that Phillips students will communicate with other Pittsburgh Public School students along other rivers such as those children at Spring Hill Elementary School and also with children in other �river� cities both nationally and internationally. It is also planned that through circulating a lap top computer to parents, the children can engage in writing letters to their parents about their river experiences and, in turn, the parents can respond. Gathering Information Libraries: There is a dearth of current print resources for students in grades K to 5 in the Phillips School Library about Pittsburgh and its rivers for various reasons: there is a lack of their existence; river education was never a curricular emphasis at Phillips; and, the resources which do exist are not age appropriate. Therefore, students will be trained in how to access Caroline (Carnegie On Line) in order to locate any titles related to river topics such as water pollution, career information, boat safety, and the like. Concurrently, teachers will be able to identify information in various libraries via the Internet for curriculum development purposes. In either case these patrons may interlibrary loan the resources through Library Services by transmitting requests via a telefacsimile unit. Databases: Students will create databases of information in the form of print and nonprint since the technology affords this latter capability. For example, primary children may create a simple database of species (in graphic form) living in the river which they have observed or intermediate students may collect water quality data from their sampling activities. It is anticipated to tap the Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh staff for their expertise in database construction. Interviews: As students increase their knowledge of the rivers, they will construct Internet interviews to conduct with other students located in river cities for comparison studies and to share their findings in local government officials. Surveys: The information gathering phase will include the development of surveys by students which they can conduct with other students on the Internet. The Historical/Geographical Perspectives theme lends itself to this tool in that Phillips students will be able to compare and contrast how events in other river communities impacted on the natural and human elements in those areas. 2. Network Resources Due to the current lack of access to the Internet, the staff has identified the following resources which they will first explore to glean river information after they have connectivity and are trained: GREEN (Global Rivers Environmental Education Network), EcoNet, Earth Kids, Tele-Fieldtrips, Weather, General Science Resources, Pen Pages, and Teacher Pages, Cleveland Freenet, and various libraries. Through electronic mail they will obtain many other resources from other parties interested in river study. 3. Evaluation Plan Evaluation will be ongoing as it is embedded in the design of each learning activity. The frequency and success in finding and communicating relevant information by students and teachers will be monitored. PLANNING PROCESS 1. Planning Period Description The planning period will officially begin on February 1, 1994 with Ms. Stacy Sweeney, President of S.S.Y. Associates/Executive Training and Development organization who will engage the staff in team building during the morning of this inservice day. The �personal development profile� for each staff member will be determined, i.e., dominance, influence, steadiness, or caution, so that a collaborative spirit pertaining to the Voyager endeavors will be in place. This initial planning phase will also include the distribution of an Internet bibliography to the staff which lists a minimal number of salient titles for the beginning practitioner. Both a Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh site coordinator and partner/alternate will be identified. Project team leaders will receive training from the CK:P staff and in turn will train the remaining teachers and parent committee members. As the river curriculum evolves the teachers will be able to correlate curricular activities and specific network resources. The staff will establish a criteria for the first group of students who will be trained, indicating the time frame and sequence for training other students and interested parents who will be borrowing the lap tops periodically. Since Phillips has a LOGO lab, the staff will pursue having students trained in some basic keyboarding skills at Priscilla Franklin�s direction. 2. Planning Period Management The planning period will be jointly managed by the principal, the Voyager Action Team from the Unit of School Support Services, and the Phillips team leaders for this project. 3. Network Exploration When the teams and their specific curricular missions are defined, and when training has occurred, the teachers will explore the Internet and identify only those resources which meet the stated objectives in each activity. 4. Common Knowledge: Pittsburgh Staff Assistance Assistance will be needed in the areas of training, continued support for access issues and equipment matters, and for new project information as it emerges. IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIO 1. Philosophy and Direction Our philosophy is to teach students the skills to make them life-long learners and the staff sees Internet access as a vital component in this process. PERSONNEL 1. Project Personnel and Roles (This information has been provided within the context of the preceding information.) TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE 1. Use of Existing Equipment The borrowed Apple Hgs will be used to begin to familiarize teachers with accessing the Internet for electronic mail purposes. Planning team leaders will explore the Internet resources and begin linking them to specific Pittsburgh Voyager activities. 2. Needed Network Architecture Student access in retrieving and managing information in the nontraditional manners which Internet connectivity affords is contingent upon the receipt of four additional computers and two lap top computers. A set of CD-ROM drives is also desired for use in accessing related databases in that format. A telefacsimile machine is needed for the interlibrary loan of resources located in libraries on the Internet. The Apple Macintosh environment is preferred given the age of the intended users. 3. Network Architecture and Education Outcomes The network architecture requested is somewhat minimal in comparison to what our students will attain in that the committee examined the core goals in the Chapter 5 �Rules and Regulations� as published on July 24, 1993. The outcomes which this project proposes to achieve are those cited in the areas of Information and Thinking Skills, Learning Independently and Collaboratively, Adaptability to Change, Communications, Science and Technology, Environment and Ecology, and Career Education and Work.