February 6, 2002
 
 

Janet Holmgren, Chairperson
Working Group on Governance 
Committee to Develop a Master Plan For Education K-University
1020 N. Street, Room 560
Sacramento, CA 95814

RE: Position of the California Teachers Association

Dear Chairperson Holmgren:

Thank you for your efforts as the Chair of the Governance Working Group. Thank you also for the acknowledgement that…"No member agrees with every assertion in the report…" In fact there are some sections of the report that as a matter of public policy there is great division.

As a member of this work group, and a representative of the California Teachers Association, I wish to make the following comments. These comments have been kept at a minimum. The concerns raised are serious and fundamental. Other issues, which I have not commented upon may still be a subject of discussion within the California Teachers Association, and may be commented upon at a later date.

" 1.  Accountability to California’s citizens for the operations of K-12 public education at large, and ultimate responsibility for the delivery of education to California’s K-12 public education students in particular, should both reside in the office of the Governor. The Governor should appoint a Chief State School Officer, to carry out, on behalf of the Governor, the following functions: establishing learning expectations, providing an accountability system of measurement (including specific technical assistance), and apportioning resources, and to serve as the Director of the Department of Education."
I dissent. The State Superintendent of Public Instruction is a constitutional office. The Citizens of California have decided that this suits them well. Additional initiative actions, or other legislative actives will take valuable resources which would be better used elsewhere. "2. The Governor should be accountable for all K-12 state-level education agencies. Rationale: Although the Group did not reach specific conclusions with respect to agencies such as the Commission on Teacher Credentialing, and although most State agencies are linked to the Governor by way of gubernatorial appointed members or staff, the Group determined that state-level alignment should be sure to include all state-level entities in order to underscore accountability and enable coordination."

I dissent. The general proposition sounds good, but in specific application it is far more complex. Teachers like all other true professionals want and deserve an independent standards entity. This is either done by significantly reforming the current CCTC, or by starting over and creating an independent standards commission governed primarily by teacher practitioners selected by teacher practitioners. CTA believes the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CCTC) should be an autonomous organization, and not advisory to any other body, and that CCTC shall be composed of no more than the present number of members (19) with a majority of classroom teachers with representation from: elementary teachers; secondary teachers; higher education faculty from teacher preparation programs; special education; one holder of any permit or credential issued by the Commission or its predecessor other than the teaching credential or services credential with a specialization in administrative services; and, at least one student member.
(The above listed teachers shall be elected from currently employed credentialed teachers within the state.)

"3. The separate executive director and staff of the State Board within the Department of Education should be eliminated." I dissent. While there could be a review to see if a reduction of staff is warranted, staff is necessary for the State Board to perform it’s role.

"Intermediate-level

1. A state-level inquiry, organized independent of current existing agencies, should examine county offices and regional entities and their ability to meet current and emerging district, intermediate, and regional needs, including fiscal oversight, academic oversight, and management and administrative assistance. After this inquiry is conducted and reported, the Master Plan should incorporate a corresponding course of action."
I dissent. This should have been concluded by the Work Group if it was critical, otherwise it uses valuable resources which could be best utilized elsewhere.
"2. An examination of collective bargaining should be undertaken to determine the extent to which bargaining agreements may constrain the ability of school districts to ensure the provision of essential non-personnel resources to students. The results of this examination should be used to determine appropriate strategy to ensure that all districts set aside sufficient resources to meet state standards before engaging in bargaining for use of public resources for personnel costs.
"The issue of collective bargaining in general was identified by the Group as being highly controversial."

I dissent. This appears to be a political agenda, and if those persons interested in this want to pursue it, then it ought not to be with valuable and scarce public resources.

California Community Colleges

1. The California Community College system’s main missions, by level, should be: state level, transfer; regional and local levels, workforce preparation; and local level, remediation.
I concur in part, however CTA believes the primary mission of the community colleges includes both academic transfer and vocational education. The following principles must be included in the mission of the community colleges: open access and a matriculation process that assists students to achieve educational goals within institutions committed to academic excellence; local flexibility to determine institutional functions and goals based on the needs of the community and its diverse populations; and, delivery of academic transfer programs and vocational education. 3. An independent agency should be identified to collect K-16 data, including cross-segmental and cross-level data. I do not concur with this recommendation. At this time, the State of California cannot afford to create this new bureaucracy. Existing agencies could be made more independent. 

Respectfully submitted,

Billy E. Frye, Middle School Teacher, English/Social Studies
Long Beach Unified School District
On Behalf of the California Teachers Association