RE: Group Reflections
- Archived: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:44:00 -0500 (EST)
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:49:41 -0500 (EST)
- From: Ken Diamond <kenken5001@yahoo.com>
- Subject: RE: Group Reflections
- X-topic: Wrapup
I don't see all that much agreement when it actually come to policy details among this group. And it is the details that matter when you are proposing laws. I don't count agreement that there is a problem with too much money and too much influence by special interests as significant. I'm sure everone came with that rather common assessment.
I could see sub-groups coming together in some sort of agreement but to speak of a group voice seem premature. Was the structure of this exercise designed to search for some kind of consensus?
Nor do I think we can fairly be labeled as some sort of representative of the public at large. Isn't this a self-selected group?
|
|
Date
|